Monday, January 31, 2011

FHA Extends 90-Day Anti-Flip Waiver
Order a Webcast About this Article

The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) will suspend it's anti-flipping rule for another year to help continue to speed the sales of some foreclosed homes.

In 2003, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued a rule that prohibited the FHA from insuring a mortgage on homes that were owned by the seller for less than 90 days.

The rule was designed to avoid "flipping" properties -- buying and quickly reselling them at inflated prices to unsuspecting borrowers.

That was several years before the housing market crashed and foreclosures flooded the market.

Last February HUD lifted the ban for one year to accelerate investors' sales of foreclosure properties. Last week, HUD extended the rule wavier for another year, until January 2012.

The housing market needs whatever it can get to speed up foreclosure transactions which can get bogged down by a host of conditions including delays, clean up issues, fix-up problems and fraud.

Without FHA mortgage insurance for a resale within 90 days, sellers balk at FHA buyers because the sellers will have to endure carrying costs along with the risk of vandalism associated with allowing a property to sit vacant for long periods of time.

Today, low-down payment FHA loans account for 30 to 50 percent or more of home purchases, depending on the location.

"With 65 percent of home buyers using FHA loans in the Inland Empire (California), this will continue to encourage investors to purchase, renovate, and re-sell these homes, get them in better condition, and make them eligible for traditional FHA financing," said Brad Yzermans, a mortgage broker with First Priority Financial.

Read More Here: http://realtytimes.com/rtpages/20110127_extends.htm

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Tax laws catch up to independent contractors

Tax laws catch up to independent contractors

Q: I own a rental property. I pay $200 per month to a gardener. Am I required to report these payments to the IRS?

A: A self-employed service provider such as a gardener, plumber or accountant you hire to perform services for your rental activity is an independent contractor for tax purposes -- and not your employee.

As such, your tax responsibilities toward him or her are modest. The general rule is that whenever you pay an unincorporated independent contractor $600 or more during the year for business-related services, you must:

File Internal Revenue Service Form 1099-MISC reporting how much you paid the workers; and

Obtain the workers' taxpayer ID number.

The IRS imposes these requirements because it is very concerned that many independent contractors don't report all the income they earn. To help prevent this, the IRS wants to find out how much you pay independent contractors and make sure it has their correct tax ID numbers.

Until this year, however, many landlords were exempt from this reporting requirement. Only landlords whose rental activities qualified as a business were required to file Form 1099s with the IRS. Landlords who were only investors were not required to comply with these reporting requirements.

A landlord is an investor for tax purposes if he or she does not regularly, continuously and systematically work at landlording. An absentee landlord who owns a few rental units entirely managed by a management company would probably be classified as an investor.

However, the law has changed. Subject to some important exceptions noted below, starting in 2011 all landlords must comply with the 1099 reporting rules, even those who are investors for other tax purposes.

So, if you haven't filed 1099s in the past, you may have to start doing so for independent contractors you hire for rental-related work in 2011 and later.

But there are some exceptions to this new rule. The following groups of landlords who are investors need not file 1099s:

Landlords who obtain substantially all of their rental income from renting their principal residence on a temporary basis;

Landlords whose annual rental income is less than a minimum amount to be established by the Internal Revenue Service; and

Other investor-landlords for whom complying with the reporting requirements would cause hardship -- the IRS will adopt regulations providing guidelines on what constitutes a hardship.

The IRS has yet to adopt detailed regulations implementing these exceptions, so we don't know yet exactly who will benefit from them.

In addition, Form 1099 need not be filed when you hire an incorporated independent contractor. But this rule is scheduled to change in 2012.

Form 1099-MISCs reporting payments made in 2011 don't have to be filed with the IRS until Feb. 29, 2012. However, you need to keep track of your payments to independent contractors during 2011 so you can report them properly in 2012.

Be sure to obtain the name, address and taxpayer identification number of any person providing services for your rental activity. Have the worker complete and sign IRS Form W-9, Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification -- prior to paying him. You don't have to file the W-9 with the IRS, just keep it in your files.

Starting in 2012, you'll have to file a Form 1099-MISC for each unincorporated service provider who performed services for your rental activity and who was paid more than $600 during the year (all payments made over the entire year are added together for purposes of the reporting threshold).

Copies of the form must be sent to the IRS, your state tax agency and the worker. The filing deadline is the end of February.

Be aware that the IRS can impose monetary penalties on landlords who fail to comply with the reporting requirements. The penalty is $250 for each 1099 you intentionally fail to file. The penalty is less if the failure is not intentional, ranging from $30 to $100, depending on how quickly you fix the error by filing the 1099.

Stephen Fishman is a tax expert, attorney and author who has published 18 books, including "Working for Yourself: Law & Taxes for Contractors, Freelancers and Consultants," "Deduct It," "Working as an Independent Contractor," and "Working with Independent Contractors." He welcomes your questions for this weekly column.

Friday, January 14, 2011

Denver Real Estate Market Heating Up, Residential Investors Clean House

Denver Real Estate Market Heating Up, Residential Investors Clean House

Author: Tim Paynter
Published: January 13, 2011 at 7:46 pm

Real estate investors have spent years trying to figure out where the bottom of the market is. According to Gregory Beran of Performance Property Management in Denver, Colorado, we are a few steps up from bottom in the Mile High City of Denver, Colorado.

According to Beran, the two ingredients that make residential properties attractive to buyers are low prices and high rents. Beran, a long time property manager and investor in the Denver metroplex, says those conditions exist right now. He says competition is heating up for his rental units and vacancy rates have plummeted.

“We don’t have any single family homes available” the lanky investor told me during an exclusive interview. “They don’t stay for rent longer than a week or so.”

When asked about two bedroom apartments Beran was only able to offer one prospect for a fast move.

“It is the trickle down effect,” Beran said during our discussion in his nicely appointed office on South Broadway Boulevard in Denver. Unlike “trickle down economics” in which wealth trickles down from the super rich to the middle class as promised by the Bush administration, the trickle down effect Beran is talking about is from those transitioning from home owners to small house and apartment renters after losing their homes in foreclosure.

“The banks aren’t letting people stay in their homes any more,” Beran explained. “So people are moving from large houses into anything we have.” The same is true for apartments, as people face a substantial lower standard of living after losing their homes and condos and being forced to accept significantly less.

Even though a person has a foreclosure or bankruptcy on their record Beran may still work with the tenant.

“I like to work with people to see if we can help them. If I am convinced they will pay the rent then we overlook a lot,” he told me.

Beran qualifies the tenant by checking their criminal and civil background. He is looking for serious criminal charges as well as prior evictions. Assuming the person has stable employment, the Denver leasing agent tries to put them into something they can presently afford.

All of this is good news for landlords trying to hang onto their properties and for new investors. Sales prices still remain competitive in Denver. There are scores of fixer uppers on the market. An investor who is able to buy right can lease the property for positive cash flow. One bedroom units rent for $550 to $595 in lower income complexes, which are favored by investors. Two bedroom units go for $650 to $750.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Denver emerging from slump

Denver emerging from slump

The overall Denver real estate market was ranked No. 9 in the prestigious Emerging Trends in Real Estate report released today.

More than 250 real estate, finance, academic and business leaders gathered at meeting at 7:30 a.m. today to hear the results of the report – billed as the longest running national real estate in the country – to hear the results of the report, whose 2011 theme is: “Entering the Era of Less.”

Although the report, which has been released for 32 consecutive years, is geared toward commercial real estate, housing issues also were front-and-center. And the economic dynamics that impact commercial properties such as offices, industrial, retail and apartments, also are the same that led to the collapse of the housing market, and it’s eventual recovery.

Homebuilding still weak.

Indeed, Denver’s lowest ranking was No. 17 out of 51 cities in the “For-Sale Homebuilding” category. Denver received a score of 4.13 in that metric, where 1 is abysmal and 9 is excellent. Washington, D.C. was ranked first in that category with a score of 5.86, while Detroit was last, with a score of 1.63. Washington, D.C, overall was first with a score of 7.0. Denver’s overall score with 5.6, tied with San Diego.

The report is sponsored by the Urban Land Institute and PWC (formerly PriceWaterhouseCoopers.) The findings of the report are based on interviews of more than 875 interviews and surveys sent to investors, fund managers, developers property companies lenders, brokers, advisers and consultants.

Denver received a “green” light in this report, after receiving a “yellow,” or caution ranking last year. Red is the lowest ranking.

Denver best between coasts

“Anything between the coasts seemed to suffer, with the exception of Denver,” said Charles DiRocco, director and head of real estate research at PCW, who spoke at the new Embassy Sites hotel on 14th Street in downtown Denver.

The report had this to say about Denver: “The city make progress positioning for 21st-century growth by strengthening its downtown core through a new light-rail and railroad hub to serve surrounding suburban nodes. As a result, the central business district becomes “the place to be,” and mixed-use, transit-oriented development helps anchor suburban districts. This metro area also has one of the nation’s most modern airports, an attractive Rocky Mountain backdrop, relatively low business taxes, and a broad-based economy anchored by oil and gas, alternative energy, and defense companies.

“We can weather the storm better than most, and quality-of-life attributes will continue to attract people,” the report quoted one anonymous person as saying.

The report goes on to say that the office market has stabilized, and large blocks of space are relatively scarce, although it said that it is still a tenant’s market.

Apartments strong

Read More: http://www.indenvertimes.com/denver-emerging-from-slump/

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Foreclosures in Colo. mountains scaling record heights

BUSINESS

Foreclosures in Colo. mountains scaling record heights

UPDATED: 01/12/2011 06:04:12 AM MST


Seven bedridden years after tumbling from a rooftop, Terry Counterman can walk again but could soon lose his Carbondale home in a foreclosure sale.

"I've been sending them paperwork and forms for two years. Someone from the bank calls five, six times a day, telling me to send them more forms. I'm sending them all the money I have, and they say it's not enough," said the 63-year-old former roofing inspector, whose lender plans to sell his home of 30 years next month. "I didn't buy this place as an investment. I bought it as my home."

On Garfield County's tally of foreclosures, Counterman's bank reports he owes about $67,000 on his loan. He's one of an unprecedented number of homeowners in Colorado's high country who are battling foreclosure.

The crush of foreclosure filings in mountain communities continued through 2010, eclipsing not just the records from the previous year but the fallout from the formidable crash of the mid-1980s.

Read more:Foreclosures in Colo. mountains scaling record heights - The Denver Posthttp://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_17071031#ixzz1ApPbE44b


Tuesday, January 11, 2011

2010 mixed for Denver metro-area homes

BUSINESS

2010 mixed for Denver metro-area homes

Number sold declines by 10.7 percent, but median price hits $235,000
By Margaret Jackson
The Denver Post
UPDATED: 01/11/2011 02:45:57 AM MST

(AP, Bill Sikes)

Buyers were willing to pay more for houses last year than they were in 2009, but the number of homes sold declined compared with the previous year.

Total homes sold in the eight metro-area counties dropped 10.7 percent, from 42,027 in 2009 to 37,522, according to an analysis of Metrolist data by independent real estate consultant Gary Bauer.

Meanwhile, the median price of a single-family home increased to $235,000, up 7.3 percent from $219,000 in 2009.

"There were more homes sold in the $1 million-plus range," Bauer said. "In 2010, there were fewer transactions in the lower price categories, mainly because of the scarcity of inventory."

Sales of homes priced at more than $1 million increased 11.2 percent, from 471 in 2009 to 524 last year.

Meanwhile, sales of homes priced between $200,000 and $300,000 declined 10.6 percent, from 11,149 in 2009 to 9,967 last year.



Read more:2010 mixed for Denver metro-area homes - The Denver Posthttp://www.denverpost.com/commented/ci_17060952?source=commented-#ixzz1An2xGOAs

Counties included in the report are Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Denver, Douglas, Elbert and Jefferson.



Friday, December 17, 2010

Four indicted in Denver mortgage-fraud scam

business

Four indicted in Denver mortgage-fraud scam


(AP file photo)

A Denver grand jury has indicted four people on 30 criminal charges in an alleged mortgage-fraud scheme that involved taking out inflated home loans and letting the properties go into foreclosure.

The gross proceeds from the alleged scam were $1.7 million, said Denver District Attorney's Office spokeswoman Lynn Kimbrough. Some of that money was used to buy additional properties, she said. The victims were mortgage companies and straw buyers whose credit was ruined, she said.

The charges include violation of the Colorado Organized Crime Control Act, or racketeering; conspiracy to commit forgery; and filing false documents. The defendants are Max Dino Salazar of Denver; his mother, Maria Marcella Salazar; Marta Quinones; and Tyrone Howard Mack. The alleged crimes occurred from 2004 to 2007.

A Denver district judge has issued arrest warrants for each of the defendants, who remain at large, Kimbrough said.

They operated companies including Millionaires Circle Financial Services, Salco House, R&R Network, Trash to Treasure, Quinones Real Estate Services, A to Z Financial Services and Ameribuild Co.

The indictment details 17 real estate transactions, most in Denver.

In one of the transactions, Quinones bought a house in Denver's Hilltop neighborhood for $460,000 in December 2002 and immediately sold it to Salazar for $600,000.

In February 2004, Salazar sold the house to John Scherling of Aurora for $680,000. Scherling bought the house at the behest of Danny DeGrande, his partner and a Centennial real estate broker, according to the indictment. Scherling couldn't make his mortgage payments and in 2005 deeded the house back to Salazar in return for a $1,000 loan to Scherling. A month later, the property went into foreclosure.

Scherling and DeGrande weren't indicted in the case. But the men were charged last year in federal court with wire fraud and money laundering. They used falsified appraisals to defraud lending companies in 22 real estate deals in Pueblo in 2004.

Scherling pleaded guilty to wire fraud in May. DeGrande, a former Colorado prison guard turned real estate investor who once owned the Colorado Ice professional indoor football team, remains a fugitive.

Greg Griffin: 303-954-1241 or ggriffin@denverpost.com



Read more: Four indicted in Denver mortgage-fraud scam - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_16879806#ixzz18NTJbBUJ
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse