Friday, December 17, 2010

Four indicted in Denver mortgage-fraud scam

business

Four indicted in Denver mortgage-fraud scam


(AP file photo)

A Denver grand jury has indicted four people on 30 criminal charges in an alleged mortgage-fraud scheme that involved taking out inflated home loans and letting the properties go into foreclosure.

The gross proceeds from the alleged scam were $1.7 million, said Denver District Attorney's Office spokeswoman Lynn Kimbrough. Some of that money was used to buy additional properties, she said. The victims were mortgage companies and straw buyers whose credit was ruined, she said.

The charges include violation of the Colorado Organized Crime Control Act, or racketeering; conspiracy to commit forgery; and filing false documents. The defendants are Max Dino Salazar of Denver; his mother, Maria Marcella Salazar; Marta Quinones; and Tyrone Howard Mack. The alleged crimes occurred from 2004 to 2007.

A Denver district judge has issued arrest warrants for each of the defendants, who remain at large, Kimbrough said.

They operated companies including Millionaires Circle Financial Services, Salco House, R&R Network, Trash to Treasure, Quinones Real Estate Services, A to Z Financial Services and Ameribuild Co.

The indictment details 17 real estate transactions, most in Denver.

In one of the transactions, Quinones bought a house in Denver's Hilltop neighborhood for $460,000 in December 2002 and immediately sold it to Salazar for $600,000.

In February 2004, Salazar sold the house to John Scherling of Aurora for $680,000. Scherling bought the house at the behest of Danny DeGrande, his partner and a Centennial real estate broker, according to the indictment. Scherling couldn't make his mortgage payments and in 2005 deeded the house back to Salazar in return for a $1,000 loan to Scherling. A month later, the property went into foreclosure.

Scherling and DeGrande weren't indicted in the case. But the men were charged last year in federal court with wire fraud and money laundering. They used falsified appraisals to defraud lending companies in 22 real estate deals in Pueblo in 2004.

Scherling pleaded guilty to wire fraud in May. DeGrande, a former Colorado prison guard turned real estate investor who once owned the Colorado Ice professional indoor football team, remains a fugitive.

Greg Griffin: 303-954-1241 or ggriffin@denverpost.com



Read more: Four indicted in Denver mortgage-fraud scam - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_16879806#ixzz18NTJbBUJ
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse

Monday, November 29, 2010

Demand for purchase loans at May levels

Demand for purchase loans at May levels

Applications at highest level since expiration of homebuyer tax credit

BY INMAN NEWS, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2010.

Inman News

Demand for purchase mortgages jumped the week ending Nov. 19 to the highest level since the expiration of the homebuyer tax credit, the Mortgage Bankers Association said in releasing the results of its Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey.

Purchase loan applications were up 14.4 percent from the week before, the MBA said, to the highest level since the week ending May 7. The increase in demand was magnified somewhat by the fact that the previous week included Veterans Day and no adjustment was made for the holiday, the MBA said.

But the survey also showed applications to refinance dropped 1 percent from the holiday-shortened week before, to the lowest levels since June, as rates for 30-year fixed-rate loans continued to climb.

"The increase in purchase applications last week aligns with other incoming data suggesting that consumers are feeling somewhat more confident with their financial situation," said Michael Fratantoni, MBA's Vice President of Research and Economics, in a statement.

Demand for purchase loans remained off 7.4 percent from a year ago, and applications to refinance still accounted for 78.6 percent of loan applications, although that was down from 80.3 percent the previous week.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages increased to 4.50 percent from 4.46 percent, with points decreasing to 0.88 from 1.12 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value (LTV) ratio loans. That's the highest rate in the survey since the week ending September 3.

The average contract interest rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 3.83 percent from 3.87 percent, with points increasing to 1.04 from 0.91 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The increase in points meant that the effective rate was unchanged.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Clearing the air on 2013 real estate tax

Clearing the air on 2013 real estate tax

High-income sellers could face new 'Medicare contribution'

By Benny Kass, Tuesday, November 16, 2010.

Inman News

DEAR BENNY: You recently wrote about the new 3.8 percent tax that can be imposed on home sales. You indicated it would not impact most homeowners who are selling their homes. However, you failed to mention that this tax apparently will be affixed to any and all sales that are not sales of primary residences occupied by the owners for two of the preceding five years. Can you explain? --Larry

DEAR LARRY: That's not exactly true. The tax is based on income and profit, and even if you have not lived in your house for a long time, you still may not have to pay this tax. Rumors are flying all over the country, claiming that the health reform legislation Congress recently enacted includes a sales tax on all real estate sales. While there is a tax, it does not apply to everyone.

The Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 became law on March 30, 2010. It is a comprehensive and extremely complex piece of legislation. One section (1402) is entitled "Unearned Income Medicare Contribution" and does impose a 3.8 percent tax on any profit on the sale of real estate (residential or investment). But it is aimed at high-income consumers, who comprise a small majority of American citizens. And in any event, it does not take effect until Jan. 1, 2013.

Let's look at the true facts of this new law. First, it is not a sales tax, nor does it impose any transfer or recordation tax. It is called a "Medicare" tax because the moneys received will be allocated to the Medicare Trust Fund, which is part of the Social Security system.

Next, if your individual income (technically called "adjusted gross income") is less than $200,000, you are home free. The income thresholds are clearly spelled out in the law. If you are married and file a joint tax return with your spouse, the law will apply only if your income is more than $250,000. If you and your spouse opt to file a separate tax return, the threshold is reduced to $125,000. For all other taxpayers, you have to earn more than $200,000 in order to be under the new law.

The up-to-$500,000 exclusion of gain from a home sale for married couples filing a joint tax return (or up to $250,000 for single taxpayers) has not been repealed; also, the right to deduct mortgage interest and real estate tax payment has not been eliminated.

How is the tax calculated? It is a complex formula that could be called "the accountant's protection act." As a taxpayer, you (or your financial adviser) must determine which is less: the gain you have made on the sale of your house or the amount that your income exceeds the appropriate threshold.

Complicated? Yes. Let's look at these examples. Your adjusted gross income is $150,000. You sell your house and made a profit of $400,000. There is no change in the way you determine your gain: You take your purchase price, add any major improvements you have made over the years, and subtract that number from the net sales price.

Based on this formula, you and your spouse have owned and lived in the property for at least two out of the five years before it was sold. Accordingly, you are eligible to exclude all of your profit; you are not subject to the new 3.8 percent tax. Keep the money and enjoy.

Change the example so that your adjusted gross income is $300,000. Since you are eligible to take the profit exclusion of up-to-$500,000, once again you do not have to pay the Medicare tax; your entire gain is excluded, and thus there is no profit to tax.

But let's assume you strike it rich and have made a profit of $600,000. Your income is $300,000. You can exclude only $500,000 under current law, so you will have to pay capital gains tax on the remaining balance. The rate currently is 15 percent, so you will owe Uncle Sam $15,000 ($100,000 multiplied by 15 percent).

But since your income is over the threshold, you now also have to pay the 3.8 percent tax. But on what amount?

As indicated earlier, the tax is based on lesser of your profit or the difference between the threshold and your income. Your profit is $100,000. The difference between your income and the threshold is $50,000 ($300,000 minus $250,000). In our example, the lower number is $50,000, and you will have to pay an additional $1,900 to the Internal Revenue Service (3.8 percent multiplied by $50,000).

According to statistics provided by the National Association of Realtors, in March of this year, for example, half of all existing homes sold for $170,700 or less. Clearly, none of these homes could make a profit of even $250,000, so if you qualify for the exclusion-of-gain requirements you will not be impacted by this new law.

This new law has yet to be analyzed or interpreted. We have more than two years before it takes effect. However, since the law applies to all forms of real estate, including vacation homes, you should consider consulting with your tax and financial advisers as to your exposure.

You will, of course, have to wait until we all have a better understanding how it will work. In the meantime, however, don't believe the rumors.

DEAR BENNY: We built a vacation home in 1989. We recently discovered that the contractor made some serious errors in construction. Evidently he used poor flashing and waterproofing techniques. We hired another contractor recently to assess the situation. The result was that we had to tear down and rebuild a significant part of the home at great cost.

We contacted the original contractor, who has told us that he has no liability and that the statute of limitations will prevent us from recovering any of our costs from him. Our insurance company says that because the damage was due to contractor error and is long-term damage, it has no responsibility either.

Is the original contractor correct in that he is protected from any action we might take against him? Any other suggestions you might have would be much appreciated.

If I have no way to recover some of the cost from the contractor or the insurance company, do you know if I can at least claim this as a casualty loss when I file my tax returns this year? --Joe

DEAR JOE: Every state has adopted what is known as a "statute of limitations." This means that after a certain number of years you lose your right to file suit. The time limitations may differ on the type of claim -- for example, suing for libel may be only one year while suing for breach of contract may be three years.

There is a public policy involved here: If you wait too long before you file suit, it will be difficult to recreate or even remember the facts. In other words, "Use it or lose it." You have to talk to your attorney about the limitations period in your state.

But there is a significant exception, called the "discovery rule." If you suddenly discover a problem that you could not have learned before the statute of limitations expired, you may still be able to file suit. Again, since state laws differ, your attorney should be able to advise you whether you still have the right to file.

Can you claim a casualty loss on your tax returns? Probably not. In order to have such a loss, the event must be sudden, unexpected or unintended. And although your loss may have been unexpected, I doubt that the IRS would accept your claim. For more information, visit www.irs.gov and download IRS Publication 547, entitled "Casualty, Disasters and Theft."

DEAR BENNY: Regarding the repeal of the "stepped-up basis" referred to in your recent column (regarding beneficiaries of inherited homes), would the repeal also apply to a home where the deceased had a life-estate interest in the home? --George

DEAR GEORGE: As you know, this year there is no stepped-up basis. Prior to this year, if the decedent owned a life interest in the property, his life interest expired when he died and there would be nothing to step up. The remainder beneficiaries would not receive any step up based on the death of the life tenant. They received the property with a basis that is the value of the property when the original owner from whom they inherited the property died.

This year (and no one knows what Congress will do about this issue) "step-up" is replaced by "carry-over basis" rules. Oversimplified, this means the basis of inherited property remains the same as it was for the deceased owner. In other words, the basis is the lesser of market value on date of death or the deceased owner's basis.

However, heirs can increase that basis up to $1.3 million (or up to $3 million for property passing to a surviving spouse) but in no event more than the appraised value on the date of death.

Benny L. Kass is a practicing attorney in Washington, D.C., and Maryland. No legal relationship is created by this column. Questions for this column can be submitted to benny@inman.com.

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Denver named a real-estate market to watch

Denver named a real-estate market to watch

Date: Thursday, October 14, 2010, 1:07pm MDT - Last Modified: Friday, October 15, 2010, 12:01am MDT

Metro Denver has been named one of the country's top markets to watch next year in the new "Emerging Trends in Real Estate 2011" report.

In its 32nd year, the commercial real estate study is compiled by the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP financial services firm and the Urban Land Institute.

The report ranks Denver 11th among U.S. cities on a list of real estate markets to watch for commercial and multifamily investment.

In the survey, metro Denver earned points for its redevelopment of downtown's Union Station as a multimodal transportation hub, having "one of the nation's most modern airports" in Denver International Airport and relatively low business taxes. The market also was singled out for its broad-based economy anchored by oil and gas, alternative energy and defense companies, and its relatively strong office and apartment markets.

One survey respondent said of Denver: "We can weather the storm better than most, and quality-of-life attributes will continue to attract people."

Other major markets to watch, according to the survey, include: Washington, New York, San Francisco, Boston, Seattle, San Jose, Houston, Los Angeles, San Diego and Dallas.

The "Emerging Trends" study is based on surveys of more than 1,000 commercial real estate experts, including investors, developers, lenders and brokers.

Looking at the United States as a whole, the study found "hopeful signs of tempered commercial real estate market improvements" for next year.

Survey respondents expect high single-digit returns for high-quality, core assets, according to the study. They think lenders with strengthening balance sheets finally will step up foreclosure activity and property sales in 2011 and 2012. Stronger real estate lenders also are expected to increase lending next year.

Property owners whose buildings have high vacancies and lower rents may have trouble with the credit markets, and even face foreclosure.

Well-located properties with strong tenants that generate good cash flow will be most attractive to investors over the next several years, the study says. Prime apartment and office properties already are getting the most attention.

The best advice to investors for 2011, from survey respondents, includes:

-- Temper expectations, and buy well-leased core assets.

-- Lock in leverage; mortgage rates can't get much lower.

-- Focus on global "gateway" cities -- 24-hour markets -- including coastal cities with international airport hubs.

-- Buy land; it won't get any cheaper.

-- Be cautious with distressed loan pools. They could be a recipe for disaster if assets aren't underwritten properly.



Read more: Denver named a real-estate market to watch | Denver Business Journal

Friday, October 29, 2010

Areas that avoided foreclosure mess earlier may be taking hit now

business

Areas that avoided foreclosure mess earlier may be taking hit now

By Margaret Jackson
The Denver Post

* (Getty Images North America)

Homes in metro Denver neighborhoods that previously appeared insulated from the housing crisis are seeing a decline in prices as foreclosures and short sales tick up. Meanwhile, those communities that were hit hardest are showing signs of improvement.

While foreclosures and short sales — known collectively as "distressed sales" — still make up a larger share of the market in lower-priced neighborhoods, the slight decline in those sales is expected to help prices there stabilize.

"If you're in a neighborhood where the number of distressed sales is increasing, it's going to push prices down," said Lon Welsh, managing broker of Your Castle Real Estate. "If you're in a neighborhood where the number of distressed sales is declining, you should see values improving."

An analysis of Metrolist data by Your Castle showed that homes priced at $461,000 or more saw the distressed sales increase from 12 percent of the total volume in the first quarter of 2008 to 17 percent in the second quarter of 2010.

Meanwhile, 69 percent of homes sold in the $95,000-$149,000 price range during the second quarter of this year were distressed, down from 84 percent of the total in the first quarter of 2008.

Overall, sales of distressed homes accounted for 42 percent of the market from January through June this year, down from 49 percent during the same period a year ago.

The movement of distressed sales into the higher-end market is putting noticeable pressure on prices in the luxury market.

Luxury real estate specialist Edie Marks has dropped the price on several homes, including the one at 11 Blackmer Road in Cherry Hills Village. The 14,657-square-foot home started at nearly $8 million. She recently put it under contract for just over $2 million.

Marks predicts that the deals people are finding as a result of short sales ultimately will result in fewer foreclosures in the upper-end market.

"People are watching," she said. "They know what the deals are, and they're starting to grab them. That's what's going to prevent us from having more foreclosures."

Even in neighborhoods without million-dollar price tags, the changing dynamics are apparent.

In neighborhoods such as Commerce City's Rose Hill, where the average home price is $93,000, the number of distressed sales declined 17 percent in the first half of the year compared with the same period a year ago.

"Some cracks in the dam"

But in Platt Park, 16 percent of the homes sold were considered distressed sales — nearly double that of a year ago. The average sales price in the neighborhood is $339,000.

"Platt Park is a pretty nice area and has been pretty insulated, but we're starting to see some cracks in the dam," Welsh said. "It will have a negative impact on pricing in the area."

The analysis by Your Castle also revealed a shift in the mix of distressed sales, with the number of foreclosures declining by about 50 percent and the number of short sales doubling.

With a short sale, the lender agrees to allow a house to be sold for less than what is owed on the mortgage. While they wind up taking a loss, it avoids the foreclosure process.

"As home prices drop, it takes a lot more potential people into that pot who are forced to do a short sale," said economist Jeff Thredgold of Vectra Bank Colorado. "At the same time, you've got lenders looking at the inevitable. Values aren't holding up, and there are different government programs that provide incentives for lenders to do short sales or write down a loan on a refinance."

Saving a client's credit rating

Many real estate agents promote short sales as a way to save a client's credit rating, which could account for the increase, said Jerra Ryan, vice president of the Colorado Mortgage Lenders Association and Cherry Creek Mortgage.

Real estate broker Ron Woodcock of ReMax/Southeast said it often costs banks more to foreclose on a property than the loss they'll take through a short sale.

But, Woodcock said, it's more difficult to do a short sale now than it has ever been.

"Where we're running into problems is with loans that have mortgage insurance on them," Woodcock said. "The banks could care less because they don't lose anything."

Wells Fargo has been encouraging short sales over foreclosures for some time, but the process can be complicated, said Cristie Drumm, spokeswoman for the bank.

"If Wells Fargo is the servicer but doesn't hold the note, the investor has to approve the short-sale offer," she said. "It's not always just as simple as 'I found a buyer and here's what they'll pay.' There can be a lot of parties that have to give approval."

But the bank prefers to work with borrowers to keep them in their homes if at all possible, Drumm said.

"We always start with looking at what modification might be an option," she said.

Margaret Jackson: 303-954-1473 or mjackson@denverpost.com



Read more: Areas that avoided foreclosure mess earlier may be taking hit now - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_16353602#ixzz13eo9LReP

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Sub-$300,000 sweet spot for home sales

Sub-$300,000 sweet spot for home sales

The “sweet spot” for Denver-area home sales continues to be for houses priced below $300,000

An analysis of home sales data by independent broker Gary Bauer found that more than 70 percent of the home sales were priced at $300,000 or below in the first nine months of the year.

Still, home sales in the price range account for a slightly smaller percentage of the total sales than they did during the first nine months of 2009, as more expensive home sales have picked up this year. Total closings, meanwhile, are down from last year.

Bauer, using Metrolist statistics, analyzed sales in the six-county area of Adams, Arapahoe, Broomfield, Denver, Douglas and Jefferson, as well as an eight-county and 11-county area, which he added Boulder and Elbert counties, and Boulder, Clear Creek, Gilpin and Park counties, respectively.

Bread-and-butter below $300K

“The sweet spot is that $300,000 and below price range,” Bauer said. “That is the bread-and-butter range. Part of that is because of the availability of homes in that price range. It also has to do with the age of the buyers and the number of foreclosure and problem-properties on the market. But the bottom line it comes down to is that homes remain very affordable in the Denver area.”

One of the troubling trends, however, is a reluctance of people who could qualify for a home are reticent to take a chance, given the turmoil the market in recent years. He said one big bank recently released a survey that found households with a combined income of $50,000 are showing little interest in buying a home in today’s market, despite record-low mortgages and affordable home prices. “We are looking at people who would rather rent than buy, which is going to cause the monthly and year-to-date sales numbers to drag for a period of time. The focus on the American Dream of homeownership is just not there anymore.”

Luxury buyers demanding

The Denver-area data also showcases a challenge to homeowners selling high-end properties and brokers selling them, Bauer said.

“Brokers must manage their expectations and far as how they to be priced and they must tell them to take credit of deferred maintenance,” as buyers at the upper-end want their homes to be in showroom condition, Bauer said. Illustrating the point, he said he recently spoke to a Realtor who had been selling lower-priced homes, and was surprised how demanding prospective buyers of a property in the $400,000 are. The home, in this case, had new carpet installed three months ago, and the buyer wanted it cleaned before he would entertain buying it. “I told that I would guarantee that if she were selling a home in the $600,000s, the buyer would demand new carpeting,” even though it was almost brand-new, Bauer said.

Tom Cryer, a broker with the Kentwood Co., uses $400,000 as his demarcation line. He finds that 82 percent to 84 percent of all of the home sales are below $400,000. “When we were going great guns and selling those millennium mansions, it was higher and then when we had the tax-credit buying at the end of last year and the beginning of this year, it drove (sale) prices down,” Cryer said. He said while there is a pick-up at the high-end as sellers aggressively slash prices, there is still this “no man’s land” above $400,000 but less than $1 million.

“Instant liquidity” key

“I’m finding to sell in that price range you have to tell a compelling story for your home,” Cryer said. “Literally, buyers have to look at your home and believe it is compelling as compared to other homes in the marketplace.” That might mean the price has to be dropped as much as 30 percent from 2007, he said, although that will vary depending on the “geography and neighborhood.”

In order to be compelling, the buyer must believe that the price tag is a good deal – not down the road, but the during the moment of signing on the dotted line, he said

“I’m finding that buyers are making decisions based on the perception of instant liquidity,” Cryer said. ”If a buyer feels he can buy it today and sell it tomorrow for the same price, and hopefully than move forward with some upward mobility – that is what it takes to get them off the couch to look at the home, and then feel comfortable enough to buy it.”

For the six-county area, home sales at $300,0000 or below accounted for 73.9 percent of the total sales, compared with 76 percent of the sales in that price range in the same period last year. Overall, there were 26,000 home sales in the first three quarters of 2010, down 7.9 percent 28,241 during the same period in 2009.

Home sales by the numbers

For the eight-county region, there were 7,946 home sales that did not exceed $300,000, accounting for 70.4 percent of the total activity. In the first nine months of 2009, there were 8,309 homes sales in that price strata, accounting for 73.6 percent of the condos and single-family home sales. Total home closings fell by 6.9 percent in the eight-county region this year to 29,523 form 31,716.

In the 11-county area, there were 8,053 homes sold at $300,000 or below, for 70.5 percent of the 29,909 home closings in the first nine months of this year. Last year, there were 8,391 home closings from January through September, accounting for 73.7 percent of the 32,084 closings.

Meanwhile, Bauer’s analysis found that among the larger counties, Denver had the most sales, followed by Arapahoe, Jefferson, Adams and Douglas.

Also, Bauer’s analysis of the six-county area found:

  • Home priced at $99,999 or below, accounted for 12 percent of closings.
  • Homes priced from $100,000 to $199,999 accounted for 34 percent of closed transaction.
  • Homes priced from $200,000 to $299,999 equaled 27 percent of all closings.

Friday, October 15, 2010

Denver named a real-estate market to watch

Business News - Local News

Denver named a real-estate market to watch

Denver Business Journal

Metro Denver has been named one of the country's top markets to watch next year in the new "Emerging Trends in Real Estate 2011" report.

In its 32nd year, the commercial real estate study is compiled by the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP financial services firm and the Urban Land Institute.

The report ranks Denver 11th among U.S. cities on a list of real estate markets to watch for commercial and multifamily investment.

In the survey, metro Denver earned points for its redevelopment of downtown's Union Station as a multimodal transportation hub, having "one of the nation's most modern airports" in Denver International Airport and relatively low business taxes. The market also was singled out for its broad-based economy anchored by oil and gas, alternative energy and defense companies, and its relatively strong office and apartment markets.

One survey respondent said of Denver: "We can weather the storm better than most, and quality-of-life attributes will continue to attract people."

Other major markets to watch, according to the survey, include: Washington, New York, San Francisco, Boston, Seattle, San Jose, Houston, Los Angeles, San Diego and Dallas.

The "Emerging Trends" study is based on surveys of more than 1,000 commercial real estate experts, including investors, developers, lenders and brokers.

Looking at the United States as a whole, the study found "hopeful signs of tempered commercial real estate market improvements" for next year.

Survey respondents expect high single-digit returns for high-quality, core assets, according to the study. They think lenders with strengthening balance sheets finally will step up foreclosure activity and property sales in 2011 and 2012. Stronger real estate lenders also are expected to increase lending next year.

Property owners whose buildings have high vacancies and lower rents may have trouble with the credit markets, and even face foreclosure.

Well-located properties with strong tenants that generate good cash flow will be most attractive to investors over the next several years, the study says. Prime apartment and office properties already are getting the most attention.

The best advice to investors for 2011, from survey respondents, includes:

-- Temper expectations, and buy well-leased core assets.

-- Lock in leverage; mortgage rates can't get much lower.

-- Focus on global "gateway" cities -- 24-hour markets -- including coastal cities with international airport hubs.

-- Buy land; it won't get any cheaper.

-- Be cautious with distressed loan pools. They could be a recipe for disaster if assets aren't underwritten properly.


Compiled by the DBJ's Paula Moore

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Bank of America stops US foreclosures for review


, On Friday October 8, 2010, 11:39 pm EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Bank of America on Friday halted foreclosures on homes across the country so it could review paperwork in tens of thousands of cases for flaws, expanding a crisis at a perilous time for the housing market.

The move came as PNC Financial Services became the fourth major bank to announce that it would stop foreclosures in at least some states. It added to growing concerns that mortgage lenders have been evicting homeowners despite flawed court papers.

Bank of America, the largest U.S. bank, had said a week earlier it would stop foreclosures in the 23 states where the process must be approved by a judge. Ally Financial's GMAC Mortgage unit and JPMorgan Chase had announced similar plans.

Bank of America's nationwide halt will apply to homes that the bank is taking back itself and those for which it has transferred the papers to mortgage buyers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The bank said it had not found any widespread problems in the foreclosure process, but "We'll go back and check our work one more time," CEO Brian Moynihan told the National Press Club in Washington.

A Bank of America spokesman acknowledged that the bank acted in response to pressure from state attorneys general and other public officials inquiring about the accuracy of foreclosure documents.

"We feel the need to address that and demonstrate that our process is accurate," said the spokesman, Dan Frahm.

A document obtained last week by The Associated Press showed a Bank of America official acknowledging in a legal proceeding that she signed thousands of foreclosure documents a month and typically did not read them. The official, Renee Hertzler, said in a February deposition that she signed up to 8,000 such documents a month.

The bank said it would take a few weeks to tackle the problem. It did not say how many foreclosure cases would be affected but estimated the figure would be in the tens of thousands.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, whose state of Nevada has been among the hardest hit by foreclosures since the recession began, and who is in a difficult fight for re-election, applauded the bank "for doing the right thing by suspending actions on foreclosures while this investigation runs its course."

Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, said he would hold a hearing on the issue next month.

The decision should help Bank of America manage its image during a dicey time for the industry, said Michael Robinson, a crisis communications expert with Levick Strategic Communications. Banks have been the target of widespread public anger since the financial meltdown.

"All the other banks are going to end up there anyway, either because they're going to be forced, or by political pressure," he said. "Americans, otherwise known as customers and voters, aren't over the economic crisis. You don't want to become a political pinata."

Banking and housing analysts fear the foreclosure document problems could prolong the already slow recovery in the housing market. Even if foreclosure is inevitable for tens of thousands of homes, the process could now drag out for years.

"If you are looking at the key in this country to economic stability, it's the housing industry," said banking analyst Nancy Bush of NAB Research. "This is a huge mess that helps nothing."

And some analysts and real estate agents worry that the uncertainty about the document mess could make potential buyers change their mind about purchasing foreclosed properties. That's because of fears that the former owners could turn around and sue.

"It's going to make people even more cautious: `Gosh, do I go in on a foreclosure?'" said San Diego real estate agent Jerry Adams Jr., who said he has seen one sale get put on hold. "It concerns me a lot."

The suspension in foreclosures could prop up home prices in the short term because fewer cheap homes would pour onto the open market in coming months. When those properties ultimately do go up for sale, the overall economy could be in better shape.

"The irony is, it may actually support the recovery," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics. "It may be that when those properties actually hit the market, the economy is in a better place."

PNC said its halt on most foreclosures and evictions applied to 23 states for a month, so it can review whether documents it submitted to courts complied with state laws.

An official at the Pittsburgh bank confirmed the decision on Friday after it was reported earlier by The New York Times. The official requested anonymity because the decision hasn't been publicly announced.

Also Friday, Litton Loan Servicing LP, a smaller mortgage company based in Houston, halted some foreclosures and evictions so it could review its handling of foreclosures. It made the disclosure in an e-mail to The Associated Press and did not say which states are affected.

Litton, owned by Goldman Sachs Group Inc., is a mortgage servicer. It collects payments but doesn't make loans.

And Stewart Title Guaranty Co. is clamping down on sales of foreclosed homes that may be linked to flawed documentation.

Houston-based Stewart issued guidelines to its agents that make it difficult to write policies on property foreclosed upon by JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, OneWest Bank or GMAC, according to an internal memo obtained by The Associated Press.

Title insurance provides protection to a homebuyer and mortgage provider in the case of any unpaid taxes, questionable ownership or other problems.

AP Business Writers Michelle Conlin and Pallavi Gogoi contributed to this report from New York. AP Business Writer Daniel Wagner contributed from Washington.

Friday, October 8, 2010

Denver-area home resales down 23% in September from 2009

Business News - Local News

Denver-area home resales down 23% in September from 2009

Denver Business Journal - by Mark Harden

Sales of existing homes in the Denver area fell 23 percent in September from a year earlier, and the inventory of unsold homes rose 18 percent, according to the latest monthly analysis of Metrolist sales data by broker Gary Bauer.

But there was a smaller month-to-month decline in home resales in September than in previous months.

Bauer said the new numbers continue to reflect the fast that "the economy is soft and consumer confidence remains low."

An estimated 2,958 resales of existing houses and condos closed in September in the area, down 23.1 percent from the September 2009 total of 3,846 homes, Bauer's report says.

That follows a 21.2 percent year-over-year decline in August and a 26.6 percent yearly decline in July.


RELATED: Denver home prices down 0.1% in July from 2009, says Case-Shiller Index


Meanwhile, home-resale closings in September were down 3.9 percent from August's total of 3,079, a smaller month-to-month decrease than August's 5.5 percent drop and July's 19.5 percent decline.

Separately, Bauer reported that Denver-area existing homes under contract in September totaled 3,646, down 30.3 percent from September 2009 and down 8.1 percent from August of this year. Home sales generally close 30 to 90 days after they go under contract.

There were 23,332 unsold existing homes on the market in September, Bauer figures, up 17.6 percent from a year earlier but down 1.2 percent from August 2010.

Denver-area existing houses sold for a median of $230,000 in September -- down a bit from $239,000 the month before but up from a median of $225,000 in September 2009, Bauer said. Condos sold for a median $129,000, down a bit from August's $130,000 and from last September's $145,000

As for averages, Bauer reported a September average home sale price of $290,025 and average condo price of $154,913.

For the first nine months of 2010 through September, Bauer reported closed home resales in the metro area down 4 percent from a year earlier.

Existing home sales, or resales, are those of homes that have been sold at least once before. Bauer's report does not include sales of newly built homes.

The numbers to some degree show the impact of the ending of the federal government’s first-time homebuyer tax credit, for which the deadline for homes under contract to qualify was April 30.

Analysts say the tax credit boosted home sales in the months before the deadline and moved up many purchases that otherwise might have happened in the summer, causing summer numbers to sag more than they would have otherwise.

Bauer, an independent residential broker in Littleton, uses data from Metrolist of Greenwood Village, metro Denver’s Multiple Listing Service, providing home-sale data to real estate professionals.


mharden@bizjournals.com

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

FHA 203(k)nocking down doors

Ira and Tegan Denison stand in their kitchen space before their 203(k) loan paid for a renovation.

The FHA 203(k) is the Swiss Army knife of loan programs.

Although it has been around for more than 30 years, many consumers –and even real estate brokers and loan agents – are unaware of its versatility.

Ira and Tegan Denison stand in their kitchen, after the 203(k) loan funded the renovation.

The program, the primary FHA loan for renovations and rehabilitation of homes, was launched in 1978. It takes its name from the 203 (k) section of the National Housing Act, which created the Federal Housing Administration in 1934.

Wide-range of benefits

The beauty of the loan is that it allows a wide-wage of benefits to home buyers, while still only requiring a 3.5 percent down payment for qualified buyers, like other FHA loans.

Buyers, at typically a slightly higher rate than a current FHA-insured loan – about 4.5 percent in today’s market – can roll all of their construction costs – big and small – into the loan. A rule of thumb is that each $10,000 rolled into the loan, typically raises the monthly payment by $53.

It helps homes appraise at a high enough level so they will qualify for a loan, which is especially important in this tough underwriting climate. For example, a kitchen renovation, funded upfront by the program, might make the difference between the housing appraising or not, at a nominal monthly increase.

Rescues trashed homes; greens them up

The program is a godsend for owner-occupants buying foreclosed or short sale homes that have been trashed. Increasingly, it also is being used to “green-up” a home with things as small as caulking, extra insulation and even solar panels. You name it and it can be cover the costs with one loan, whether you want to roll in the cost of landscaping, electrical work, roofing, gutters, tiles, plumbing, or even the installation of a well or a septic system into the 203(k) loan.

The vast majority of the handful of Denver-area lenders who offer it use the streamlined version, which has a $35,000 maximum loan amount, Universal Lending (a sponsor of InsideRealEstateNews) and Wells Fargo offer the full-blown version, which allows loans up to the FHA-limit of $406,250. In other words, while the full program won’t cover the cost of a high-end home that requires a jumbo loan, it provides far more than the typically priced home in the metro area, which is less than $270,000. Indeed, some borrowers have used it to purchase and gut the home, or even for a scrape off. However, the program is not currently available to flippers and investors, although there is talk some version of the program may be extended to them down the road.

“Amazing loan program”

“What an amazing loan program,” said Jocelyn Predovich, president of Limetree Lending Group, which is part of the Universal Lending family.

She said once real estate brokers and home buyers realize all it has to offer, they can’t wait to take advantage of it.

“It’s a matter of education,” said Predovich, the budding “Queen of the 203(k)”, who has written two e-books and hosted six videos on the loan program. “Clients and real estate agents just don’t understand the potential of this loan.”

Oct. 20 workshop

To help educate people, she is hosting a free workshop on the program from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 20, on the third floor of Universal Lending’s headquarters at 6775 E. Evans Ave. Real estate brokers attending can earn two hours of continuing education credits by attending. Those interested in registering can e-mail Predovich at 
jocelyn@limetreelending.com.

Predovich said she typically closes 10 to 15 loans each month, and on average five of them are 203(k) loans. A month ago, she hosted a half-day conference on appraising homes, and addressed the loan program to about 75 real estate brokers, which led to her signing 13 clients who could potentially benefit from a 203(k) loan.

She said about 70 percent of those using them have been using the streamlined version, with the rest needing a bigger loan.

203(k) nets big bucks

The streamlined version was too anemic for Jennie Nash. She and her husband took out a $289,000 203(k) loan – $199,000 for the purchase of a home in Conifer and the rest for a major construction job.

They planned to live in the house for five years, but ended up selling it after a year. “Unfortunately, we’re going through a divorce,” said Nash, 48, who now is fixing and flipping homes.

“We put the home on the market in the middle of the week, and in three days we had an offer,” she said.

They bought the home as a foreclosure. It was originally 1,900 square feet and before the lender took it back, the previous owner was doubling its size.

“It was maybe 40 percent complete when we bought it,” Nash said. They used the loan to finish the kitchen, add drywall, extra insulation, finish a bathroom that had been roughed in, and prime and paint the exterior, as well as replace the electrical system.

“Tremendous opportunity”

“When we told our real estate agent what a huge project it was going to be, she said this sounds like a prime candidate for a 203(k),” Nash said. “We had never heard of it before. But what an amazing loan. There is no way we could have done this without the loan. It provided a tremendous opportunity for us.”

1st time buyers love it

At the other end of the spectrum were Ira and Tegan Denison, 28, and 27, respectively. They bought a home in the Seven Hills area of Aurora for just under $200,000, with about $15,000 rolled into it for construction improvements.

In addition to the 203(k), they were able to take advantage of the $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers.

“We had never heard (of the 203(k) before,” Tegan said. But when they found a home tri-level home that they loved, they were disappointed it didn’t appraise high enough for a loan.

The 203(k) came to the rescue, allowing them to tear out walls between the kitchen and living room and kitchen and dining room, really opening up their house. They also put in wood floors and installed new appliances and put an island in the kitchen, modernizing the home that still had a 1970s-feel.

“We love to entertain, so this is great,” she said.

Renovatining when buying cuts stress level

And although they had to live in a construction zone for about four months, it was well worth it, she said.

“We met with a contractor, he scoped it out and we gave him our vision, and he shared his vision with us, and priced out all of the materials and costs,” she said.

Even if they didn’t need the improvements to make the home get a high enough appraisal, it was well worth it, she said.

“What is really awesome is that we had it done right away, instead of scraping the money together and waiting 10 years to do it, like my parents did,” she said. “And the cost is very reasonable.”

She said she has passed on the virtues of the 203(k) to a number of their friends who are looking to buy a home.

Universal Lending leader of the 203(k) pack

The biggest player in the 203(k) world in the Denver-area appears to be Universal Lending.

Well-known real estate attorney, Oliver Frascona, last month said there are only a handful of lenders that offer 203(k) loans and without a doubt, Universal appears to be doing far more than any of the others.

Universal, including its affiliated companies, completes more than 200 203(k) loans annually, said Matt Ackerman, of Universal Lending. Loans, he said, have ranged from $5,000 to north of $250,00.

Still, it is a niche product, he said.

“I don’t think they’re ever going to be mainstream loan,” Ackerman said. “I don’t think they will ever even make up 10 percent or 20 percent of the market.”

For one thing, they take more planning than other loans. That’s because the buyer has to decide what construction projects it will include in the financing, get cost estimates for them, and then hire a contractor to do the work. And the contractor won’t be paid fully until the work is completed, so he has to be on board with the process.

A lot of work

“They’re a lot of work,” said Robert McGuire, a broker with Your Castle Real Estate. “They take more time for the lender as well as the home buyers.”

McGuire said that “Universal Lending’s name usually comes up first,” for the 203(k) program, but he said he has directed clients to other lenders, too, such as America’s Lending, which offer the streamlined version.

“I’ve never done a full-strength one,” McGuire said. “Honestly, I’ve never had a client who needed one.”

Ray Williams, of Summit Mortgage, also only offers the streamline version. So far, he said, that seems to be filling the needs of most his clients.

“I think the younger HGTV-generation, who watch shows like Renovation Realities, are the ones most familiar with the 203(k),” Williams said. “They aren’t afraid to get their hands dirty and are the ones most open to it.”

Still, buyers aren’t beating down his doors to sign on the 203(k) dotted line.

“Interest in them seems to come in waves,” Williams said. “A while ago, not too long ago, I might be doing three or four a month, and then I won’t do any.”

He said that he recently was approved by the Department of Regulatory Agencies to teach courses on 203(k) for continuing education credits, so he may be offering some workshops the program.

Hand-holding, knowledge crucial

Predovich, the lender offering the free workshop on Oct. 20, said that while the loans are daunting for a lot of lenders, she said she has it down to a system, and makes it as painless as possible for home buyers.

“We do a lot of hand-holding,” she said. “And we have our system down pat.”

Realtor used it herself

Another fan of the product is Kelly Bank, principal of the Bank Group at 8z Real Estate. (8z is a sponsor of this site.) Indeed, she has put her money where her mouth is.

“I used one on my own home,” Bank said. “And I’ve done a number of them for clients. It’s really a great opportunity to build instant equity.”

Easy to be green

Predovich said that one emerging trend is to use it to go green.

“This is the only loan product on the market today that will finance the cost of transforming a property into a green home at the time of purchase,” she said.

John Keene, an “eco-broker” with Live Green Real Estate, said that he hasn’t put a client into a 203(k) yet, but he is eager to do so, especially because of the green-angle.

“I work with an eco-broker, so I am interested in using them in a sustainable way,” Keen said. “I explain to people if they spend a little more for Energy Star appliances or more insulation, it will be worth it, as far as helping the environment and the economic payback. I could even see it be used for putting solar on your roof.”

Ackerman, of Universal Lending, said that one strategy is to use the 203(k) in conjunction with federal and local incentives offered for energy efficient products and improvements.

“I do not know if we’re going to see a whole lot of it used for solar, although we’ve had a few use it for solar installations,” he said. “More and more, leasing solar seems to becoming more popular than paying for it outright.”

And Bank of 8z Real Estate said that most of her clients who have used the 203(k) loans are first-time home buyers, who already are stretching to buy. “They are more interested in just qualifying for the loan, than any green features,” Bank said. “I would think that might be more attractive for the higher-end buyers, though.”

Would have, could have, should have

While it’s not exactly buyer’s remorse, Ackerman said that a lot of buyers become wistful about the loan program, when they hear about it after they have bought their home, and are now contemplating home improvements.

“I can’t tell you how many people have told me that they wish they had known about this program at the time they were buying a house” he said. “But it’s not for the faint of heart.”

Video: Jocelyn Predovich on 203(k) loans

Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Some push for foreclosure freeze in Colorado

business

Some push for foreclosure freeze in Colorado

By Margaret Jackson
The Denver Post
Updated: 10/05/2010 06:49:35 AM MDT

A foreclosed home is advertised on a Re/Max yard sign in Denver on Monday. Foreclosure proceedings have been halted by three banks in some states, but Colorado has not been included. The state has asked Ally Financial to extend the freeze to Colorado. (Matthew Staver, Bloomberg)

Moves by three major mortgage companies to halt foreclosures while they examine their procedures haven't affected homeowners in Colorado, but some in the state would like to see the foreclosure moratoriums extended here.

The lenders have temporarily stopped processing foreclosures as they investigate whether information included in foreclosure documents was properly verified.

Colorado hasn't been affected so far because of the unique process that foreclosures go through here.

"We are the only state that operates through a public trustee," said Stephanie Riggi, manager of the Colorado Foreclosure Hotline. "In other states, a lot of these (foreclosures) were handled through a court proceeding. It may not impact our homeowners who have gone through foreclosures."

But many in the legal community think the moratoriums in place in other states should be extended to Colorado because the foreclosure process is so complex that it's difficult to determine whether the cases have been handled improperly.

Attorney General John Suthers asked Ally Financial to extend the freeze by its GMAC Mortgage unit to Colorado and is considering asking other banks to do the same.

"It's possible that there could be home owners that could be affected here," said Mike Saccone, spokesman for the attorney general's office. "We're still in the exploratory phase. We're still trying to determine if these processes could have affected Colorado consumers."

Other lenders that have suspended foreclosures are JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. Separately, news came out this week that a Wells Fargo executive said he verified only the dates on up to 150 foreclosure documents he signed daily. He said he trusted co-workers to make sure other information in the documents was accurate.

Wells Fargo has said it has no plans to stop foreclosures, because the bank is sure that its documents are correct.

Real-estate attorney Robert Goodbinder said the bulk of foreclosures in Colorado are never challenged, because most people don't hire an attorney to help them.

"Because they're not challenged, they just sail through," he said. "We've got a huge number of foreclosures, and the borrowers aren't qualified to determine whether there's a problem. Judges don't set these for a hearing unless somebody files an appropriate response. Virtually no one who is a borrower would know what to look for."

Foreclosures in Colorado rose from July to August but are running lower than last year, according to a report last month from the Colorado Division of Housing.

Statewide foreclosure filings in August totaled 3,142, up from July's 2,718 but down from 3,496 in August 2009.

Ryan McMaken, who tracks foreclosure numbers for the Colorado Division of Housing, said that even if the banks do halt foreclosures here, it's not likely to make a difference in how the local housing market is perceived.

"I think people will know it's a policy change and will proceed with the normal level of caution," he said.

Margaret Jackson: 303-954-1473 or mjackson@denverpost.com



Read more: Some push for foreclosure freeze in Colorado - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_16253886#ixzz11UjqflsX

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Mortgages Are About to Get More Expensive

Mortgages Are About to Get More Expensive

Mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Authority have been among the easiest to qualify for. But starting Monday, they’ll be harder to get – and cost more.

In recent years, FHA mortgages have become incredibly popular, as banks, scared by the mortgage meltdown, looked for guarantees to protect loans to even well-qualified borrowers. Today, these government-backed home loans make up more than 30% of the mortgage market, up from 3% in 2006. And for borrowers, the FHA-backed loans require lower down payments and credit scores than most other mortgages.

Now, the federally guaranteed loans are getting less attractive to borrowers. In an effort to recoup losses sustained over the last few years of mortgage mayhem, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which oversees the FHA loan program, is raising the cost to borrowers and raising the required credit scores. But in order to earn more money on fewer loans to less risky borrowers, the agency is increasing the mortgage insurance fee tacked on to FHA loans to up to 0.95% (it had been 0.50%). Over the life of a 30-year $300,000, that’s at least an additional $24,000 in payments. And because higher annual premiums result in larger monthly payments, some buyers likely won’t be able to borrow as much.

More FHA lending adjustments and price hikes may be on the way. “We will make additional changes as needed,” says a HUD spokesman, citing the need to protect the FHA’s reserve funds. From September 2008 to June 2010, the fund fell from $19.3 billion to $3.5 billion as it helped cover borrowers’ defaults and foreclosures.

All this spells bad news for homebuyers – and at a time when houses are significantly cheaper. With banks reluctant to lend without a guarantee, and private institutions mostly refusing to provide one, the federal government has been the guarantor of last resort for would-be home-owners. And now they’re taking a step back. "The signal is that FHA is expecting a somewhat better borrower,” says Keith Gumbinger, vice president of mortgage-data tracking firm HSH Associates. As of Monday, borrowers with credit scores below 500 will no longer qualify for an FHA-backed loan, and those with scores under 580 must put at least 10% down -- up from the 3.5% down payment required previously. For the more 15 million consumers with scores in that 80-point range, the message is clear: If you want to buy a home, get your credit score up first.



Read more: Mortgages Are About to Get More Expensive - Personal Finance - Real Estate - SmartMoney.com http://www.smartmoney.com/personal-finance/real-estate/mortgages-are-about-to-get-more-expensive/#ixzz11CiZpuuk

Friday, September 10, 2010

Denver home sales sluggish in August

Denver home sales sluggish in August


Metro Denver's home buying season, which started with a bang this year, is ending with a whimper.

There were 3,079 home sales closed in the metro area in August, down 5.5 percent from the 3,259 closed in July, according to home sales numbers released Thursday.

Sales are down significantly from the more than 4,000 homes closed per month in April, May and June, when federal tax credits for move-up and first-time buyers drove demand.

"We had this frenzy of activity to get homes under contract," said Gary Bauer, an independent real estate analyst. "We are seeing fewer showings now, and buyers are being very deliberative and taking a long time."

The expiration of the credits contributed to an even steeper plunge in homes placed under contract, from 6,616 in April to 3,883 in May.

But the number of contracts to buy homes has held steady in the 3,800 to 4,000 range per month ever since, helped in part by historically low interest rates.

"There is a market out there, but the market is defining itself each and every month," Bauer said.

Compared with August 2009, sales contracts were down 24.4 percent, while actual closings were off 21.2 percent.

More sluggish activity contributed to a 16.8 percent rise in the inventory of homes available for sale to 23,615 in August compared with a year earlier.

Measured year-to-date, however, home sales are down 1.4 percent and homes under contract are down 8.6 percent.

That would seem to indicate the homebuyer credits pulled demand forward.

"Many of those earlier sales would be occurring today if it weren't for the tax credit," said Larry McGee, president of the Berkshire Group.

But despite a sharp drop-off, buyers didn't disappear entirely when the credits ended April 30.

"We are doing better than many of us expected," McGee said.

Despite the slowing pace of home sales, prices remained fairly stable. The median price for homes sold in August was $239,900, compared with $240,000 in July and $227,000 in August 2009.

The median price of condos sold rose to $130,000 in August from $129,000 in July but is down from a median sales price of $144,500 a year ago.

Aldo Svaldi: 303-954-1410 or asvaldi@denverpost.com



Read more: Denver home sales sluggish in August - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_16036669#ixzz0z8OJBWei

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Cisneros: Worst over for Colorado housing market

Denver Business Journal - by Paula Moore

Colorado’s housing market will continue to face challenges, but the worst appears to be over, according to national housing expert Henry Cisneros, a former Cabinet secretary who was in Denver on Tuesday.

“I think the bleeding has stopped in Colorado,” Cisneros said of the state’s housing market. “There are no huge drops in price here, no large inventories.”

Cisneros, former secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development under President Bill Clinton and now executive chairman of CityView, was in Denver discussing the U.S. Treasury Department’s recent Housing Finance Summit. Cisneros also is an advocate for equal opportunity in homeownership.

CityView, a real estate investment company based in Los Angeles, is an investor in The Peloton condo project in Boulder.

A major top of discussion at the summit was the fate of Freddie Mac (OTCBB: FMCKN.OB) and Fannie Mae (OTCBB: FNMA.OB), two government-sponsored enterprises that buy mortgages on the secondary market, pool them and sell them as mortgage-backed securities to investors. The entities have been partly blamed for the recent U.S. housing crisis, and were taken over by U.S. regulators in the fall of 2008, as high loan delinquencies and property foreclosures brought them close to collapse.

U.S. lawmakers have been considering what to do about Freddie and Fannie, including possibly disbanding the entities, splitting them into separate pieces or replacing them with a new entity.

“I think it’s playing with fire to abolish Freddie and Fannie,” Cisneros said. “I think there will be a restructuring of them, but I don’t know what it will look like yet.”

Cisneros explained that, despite their recent problems, Fannie and Freddie contribute greatly to many Americans’ ability to buy a home. If what they do were fully privatized, mortgage costs likely would go up.

“Freddie and Fannie are essential to the homeownership process,” he said.

Cisneros believes Colorado’s housing market, particularly in Denver and the rest of the Front Range area, is coming out of its doldrums because this area’s housing market started having trouble earlier than other areas. What’s more, as economic development experts also have said, the state’s relatively strong economy — based in part on future growth industries such as technology, bioscience, sustainable energy, etc., and which attract workers from other states — is helping its housing market.

“Colorado has the kind of economy that can come back … and Denver is a prototype for smart growth — sustainable, denser building,” said Cisneros, whose father grew up in Brighton.

CitiView, started in 2000 by Cisneros, has generated more than $2 billion in urban investment in 45 U.S. markets, according to the company.

CityView’s $150 million, 390-unit Peloton project is on Arapahoe Avenue at 33rd Street in Boulder. Its 191-unit first phase has sold more than 70 units for $23 million total, since dropping prices in mid-2009. Remaining units are priced at about $250,000 to the low $500,000s.


pmoore@bizjournals.com | 303-803-9232

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Denver Median Home Price Increases For The Ninth Consecutive Month


Denver Median Home Price Increases For The Ninth Consecutive Month

Published on:
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Written by:
DQNews

First time home buyers, and buyers using FHA-insured loans, made up nearly half of all home sales in the Denver area for June 2010. Median sales prices, in June, for both new and resale homes were up from May as well, compared to the same period last year. The gain represented the ninth consecutive month of median price increases. See the following article from DQNews for more on this.

Denver real estate
Downtown Denver
Denver-area home sales picked up in June but remained well below average. A total of 4,881 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in June across the eight-county Denver-Aurora metro area. That was up 12.8 percent from May and up 6.7 percent from a year earlier, according to MDA DataQuick of San Diego. The firm tracks real estate trends nationally via public property records.

June sales were 22.6 percent below average for the month and were the second-lowest for any June since at least 1998, when DataQuick's complete Denver-area statistics begin.

The median price paid for all new and resale houses and condos combined in June was $217,740, up 2.1 percent from $213,000 in May and up 3.6 percent from $210,000 in June 2009.

June's median was 12.2 percent lower than the Denver area's peak $247,569 median in June 2006. The overall median has risen on a year-over-year basis for nine straight months.

Absentee buyers, a group that includes investors, accounted for 17.7 percent of June home sales, while buyers who appeared to have used cash represented 20.0 percent of sales. First-time buyers and others using government-insured FHA loans accounted for 48.3 percent of sales.

In neighboring Boulder County, sales in June totaled 573, up 12.1 percent from May and up 7.7 percent from a year earlier. The median price paid for all homes sold in June was $320,500, up 11.3 percent from May and up 9.5 percent from a year earlier.

The Denver metro area statistics in this report and in the table below reflect sales in Adams, Arapahoe, Broomfield, Clear Creek, Denver, Douglas, Jefferson and Park counties.

This article has been republished from DQNews. You can also view this article at DQNews, a real estate research and news site.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Home sales fall 28%

Home sales fall 28%

Denver-area homes placed under contract in July plunged 28 percent in July from July 2009, as the fall-out from the home buying tax credits continued longer than expected.

“I think July was a grim month,” said independent broker Gary Bauer, who prepared a report on Denver-area home sale activity, using Metrolist data. It was the largest year-over-year in July sales since at least 1990.

There were 3,808 single-family homes and condos placed under contract last month, compared with 5,266 in July 2009. The number of home closings from July 2009 fell by 28.6 percent to 4,440. Year-to-date, the 32,203 homes under contract represent a 6.2 percent drop from the first seven months of 2009, which was one of the worst years on record.

“I really am surprised,” by the poor showing, Bauer said. Although he and others knew that sales activity would drop following the expiration at the end of April of the tax credits, which provided provided as much as $8,000 to qualified first-time home buyers, he thought the market would have improved, especially since mortgage rates are at record lows and sellers typically are more willing to deal on prices.

“I thought we would see a little larger momentum,” Bauer said. “If you look at consumer confidence, it just continues to decline. Making a long-term purchase such as home, has just fall off the radar screen for a lot of people.”

Jeff Bernard, a RE/MAX broker who concentrates on business and technology consulting, said that the 28 percent is huge, and does not bode well for the future.

Market fell off the cliff

“Wow,” said Bernard, principal of Bernard Analytics and other companies. “A 28 percent drop is falling off the cliff. I wouldn’t want to fall off this cliff without a helmet on. And this could be a turning point, as we are headed into a period that sales tend to drop off for seasonal reasons.”

Bernard said that he thinks the country is moving into a deflationary cycle, something that hasn’t been experienced in the U.S. since the Great Depression. He said that people aren’t buying, because they think that both interest rates and home prices will fall even lower, which is a classic sign of deflationary thinking.

However, Dave Liniger, the founder of RE/MAX International, isn’t losing any sleep over deflation.

“It’s not going to happen,” Liniger said. “Our government likes to spend money too much.”

Meanwhile, the Metrolist data also shows that the number of unsold homes on the market rose 14.6 percent from July 2009 to 23,933 form 20,890. And the average price of a single-family home that closed in July rose to 4297,216 from $299,375 a year earlier. The median price of a single-family home rose to $240,000 from $229,900.

Tax credit debate

Bernard remains a big defender of the tax credits. He believes there are too many other dynamics in the market to blame the downturn on the demise of the tax credits.

But Lon Welsh, principal of Your Castle Real Estate, is not sure the tax credits worked out the way the government expected. He said research indicates 80 percent or more of the buyers who took advantage of the credits planned to purchase anyway, “and this just was a free gift from the government. ”

He said one of the Realtors in his company represented a first-time home buyer who was planning to buy a home this month when his lease was up. But the $8,000 tax credit more than made up for the $1,000 cost of breaking his lease.

Welsh compared the program to cash-for-clunkers.

“This stimulated a lot of demand,” Welsh said. “However, after that credit expired, sales for cars dropped significantly. If you compare the size of the mountain of “excess sales” before the cash for clunker credit expired and the valley of “lost sales” after the credit… they turn out to be about the same size. There was essentially no net change in the total number of cars sold. But the taxpayers have a larger deficit to pay off down the road. I think we’ll see the same thing with this home tax credit. We’ll see a “hangover” of low sales volume for three to six months to make up for the excess sales in November to December 2009 and the first few months of 2010. I’ll go out on a limb and forecast that total home unit sales in Denver will be lower in 2010 than they were in 2009. ”

More bad news on the horizon

He also expects prices in the fourth quarter will be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2009.

“Expect to see some negative headlines coming up,” Welsh said.

Al Latham said that this is the worst real estate downturn he has seen during his four decades in the business. ”This is worse than the late 1980s, by far,” said Latham, the president and founder of with Distinctive Properties.

He said that in areas such as Cherry Creek, some homes have dropped in price by $800,000 or $900,000, and that has led qualified buyers to think they may drop even more. ”The thing is, a home that was at $1.9 million and is now on the market for $950,000, never should have been priced at $1.9 million,” Latham said. “They were grossly over-priced.”

He said there is a huge disconnect between buyers and sellers, especially in the luxury market. He said his wife, Debbie, has shown one couple, looking for a home in the $800,000 range, about 50 homes in the past six or seen months.

Latham, however, supports the tax credits.

“It helped kids get into homes priced under $250,000,” Latham said. “It was a great way to get young people into the loop of homeownership, which will help them in the long-run. Mark my words, and I base this on 40 years of selling homes, in two or three years, people are going to regret not buying today at these prices and these interest rates.”

Market poised for rebound

David Binkowski, principal of Prudential Real Estate of the Rockies, said that he thinks the 28 percent drop in sales was only a lull in the market, which he believes is poised to rebound.

“I think a drop off is expected whenever you end a program like this,” Binkowski said. “But the truth is, if you do the math, home are better priced today because of the lower interest rates. I think some people are waiting because they think there might be another government incentive program or something like that. I think things are looking up for August. It all comes down to jobs and a sense of urgency. I would like to see the government do more to create jobs than offer another incentive program.”

Summer time, buyers are sluggish

One thing that could have cooled July sales was the hot weather, said Stephanie Prather, of 8Z Real Estate.

“It has been a really hot summer,” said Prather. “You can’t overlook the impact of weather. When it is really hot, it just plays havoc with people’s minds. It crates a bit of a summer doldrums. Maybe we will see some pick up in September, when things are cooler and people who don’t have to worry about kids and school will be back in the market.”

September sale surge?

Corey Wadley, the co-owner of Nostalgic Homes, said that in its Northwest Denver market where it does the bulk of its business, overall, transactions were down 42 percent from July 2009; sales volume is down 41 percent; while the average sales price is up a fraction.

He said that across the market, sellers appear to lack confidence in selling their homes. But he noted that his wife, Jenny Apel, is staring to see a pick up in listings. Apel is the top broker and one of the owners of Nostalgic Homes.

“It feels like confidence is back,” Wadley said. “It takes a couple of months, unfortunately, for that to turn into volume, so we are feeling good about September and beyond.”